Skip to content
Poberailo
·6 min read

Kinoautomat (1967): The First Interactive Film

Kinoautomat: One Man and His House premiered on 23 June 1967 at the Czechoslovak Pavilion of Expo 67 in Montreal — the first interactive film in history. The hall voted on the plot with green and red buttons, while Radúz Činčera’s comedy quietly steered every branch back to one spine: the hero’s apartment burned in every version. How it worked, why the “illusion of choice” was the point, and what you can still watch today.

In brief

FactValue
Original titleKinoautomat: Člověk a jeho dům (One Man and His House)
Premiere23 June 1967, Czechoslovak Pavilion, Expo 67, Montreal
Author and directorRadúz Činčera, with Ján Roháč and Vladimír Svitáček; scenography by Josef Svoboda
StarringMiroslav Horníček as Mr. Novák — and as the live moderator at the premiere
Genre and runtimeblack comedy, 63 minutes
Voting127 seats with green/red buttons; about nine stop points — only 19 distinct scenes in total
Technologytwo synchronised 35 mm projectors, switched by a lens cap
Fatea successful Prague run, then banned in 1972; revived in 2007; later released on DVD

The plot of “One Man and His House”

The film-within-the-system is a short black comedy. Petr Novák, an ordinary tenant of a Prague housing block, opens the door to his neighbour — and the screening begins with a flash-forward: his apartment is on fire, and Mr. Novák believes he is responsible. Everything that follows is a series of flashbacks explaining how he got there — and at every fork the hall decides his next move.

The casting was part of the design: Miroslav Horníček played both Mr. Novák on screen and the moderator on stage. At the Montreal premiere he delivered his English links phonetically: the moderator’s patter (“You have made an excellent choice”) was as scripted as the film itself.

How the voting worked

Every one of the 127 seats had a console with green and red buttons. The film froze at a stop frame; the moderator presented the two candidate scenes; the hall voted; the tally lit up along the screen edge, seat by seat; and the projectionist switched a lens cap between two synchronised projectors, each threaded with a different cut. The chosen scene played, and the film ran on to the next stop. The title was literal: a vending machine for plot turns, run entirely by live theatre — a moderator, a hall, a projectionist.

film playsstop frametwo new scenesscene Ascene Bmoderatorgreen / red · 127 seats84 : 43tally on the screen edgeproj. Aproj. Blens-cap switch, synchronisedVote → tally → the projectionist switches between two synchronised projectors (Kinoautomat, 1967)

The pavilion’s scenography came from Josef Svoboda of Laterna Magika, Czechoslovakia’s experimental multimedia theatre: Kinoautomat was that tradition projected into cinema — not new camera technology, but an architecture of participation around a conventional print.

The illusion of choice: why every branch converges

The part most often forgotten: the votes barely changed the story. The script was written so that both scenes offered at every fork returned to the same next chapter — only ever 19 distinct scenes existed. Whatever the hall decided, the ending stayed the same: the fire. The satire was aimed squarely at democracy itself — a majority rules, and nothing changes — and Činčera made no secret of it: the fire was the message.

opening: the fireflash-forwardvotescene 2ascene 2bsame scene 3vote4a4bthe firein every versionNodal branching with convergence (typology of brief 08): forks spend drama, the spine stays single

In the typology I use across this site, Kinoautomat is nodal branching with hard convergence: forks spend drama, but the spine stays single. The immersion-versus-agency debate Kinoautomat staged in 1967 still runs through interactive-cinema theory — I map it in “Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Interactive Cinema”, and the history chapter is in my master’s thesis.

The fate of the film after Expo 67

In Montreal the pavilion became a sensation — the American press called it the guaranteed hit of the exposition, and Hollywood came asking. The answer was short: the concept belonged to the state, and under the Communist government there was nothing to sign. The system toured — HemisFair in 1968, Expo ’74 in Spokane — and in 1971–72 Kinoautomat finally ran at home, at Prague’s Světozor, to full houses.

Then it disappeared: in 1972 the ruling party banned the film. Činčera belonged to the “politically unconfident” authors, as his daughter Alena Činčerová recalled. In the 1990s Czech television briefly broadcast the film with the two reels split across two channels, ČT1 and ČT2 — switching channels at every fork assembled a different version. Činčera’s verdict: “They felt cheated. I was right. It was a complete disaster.”

From Kinoautomat to Bandersnatch

Half a century later the scheme returned as mainstream form. Black Mirror: Bandersnatch (2018) put the fork back into the story’s hands, but on streaming: the hall became a remote control, the moderator a timer. Every Bandersnatch review had to explain why its branches do not matter “more”. That debate is the direct heir of 1967 (where the line runs). What Kinoautomat knew and Bandersnatch re-learned: legible choice and consequential choice are different design problems, and a converged spine is often the only affordable one. The full family of structures is mapped in my branching-structures guide; base definitions — in the pillar article on interactive cinema.

Where to watch (verified options only)

No official streaming release exists. Verified: a DVD edition followed the 2007 revival — restored picture, a newly recorded moderator, dubbed language options (English, German, Italian) — so the practical route today is the DVD or a retrospective screening. Screenings do happen — the verified timeline is in the table below; watch the programmes of film archives and cinematheques.

Screenings and revivals (verified)

Where and when Kinoautomat actually played, from the premiere onward:

YearVenueContext
1967Czechoslovak Pavilion, Expo 67, Montrealworld premiere; moderated by Miroslav Horníček
1968HemisFair, San Antoniothe system toured world expositions
1971–72Kino Světozor, Praguethe home run — full houses, then the 1972 ban
1974Expo ’74, Spokanethe last theatrical performance of the original era
2006National Film Theatre, Londonretrospective screening
2007Kino Světozor, Prague40th-anniversary revival; DVD edition followed
2009Tyneside Cinema, Newcastle; Filmfest DCrevival screenings

FAQ

What was the first interactive movie?

Kinoautomat: One Man and His House, premiered 23 June 1967 at the Czechoslovak Pavilion of Expo 67 in Montreal: the audience voted on plot decisions with green and red buttons.

Who made Kinoautomat, and who acted in it?

Conceived and directed by Radúz Činčera with Ján Roháč and Vladimír Svitáček; scenography by Josef Svoboda of Laterna Magika. Miroslav Horníček starred as Mr. Novák and moderated the premiere on stage.

How did the voting work?

All 127 seats had green/red consoles. At each stop the moderator presented two candidate scenes, the hall voted, the tally appeared at the screen edge, and the projectionist switched between two synchronised projectors.

Did the audience’s choices actually change the story?

Barely. The script returned every branch to the same spine — only about 19 distinct scenes were ever made — and the film ended with the apartment burning no matter what. That was the joke: a satire of decision-making where a majority rules and nothing changes.

Why was Kinoautomat banned?

After a successful Prague run in 1971–72, the ruling Communist party banned the film in 1972: Činčera belonged to authors considered politically unreliable, and a comedy about the emptiness of voting was unwelcome.

Can you watch Kinoautomat today?

Not on streaming — no official online release is verified. The verified options: the DVD edition released after the 2007 revival (restored picture, re-recorded moderator, dubbed language tracks) and occasional retrospective screenings.

Why is Kinoautomat called a forerunner of Bandersnatch?

Both put a fork into a film and let the audience pick a branch — and both were criticised for branches that converge. Kinoautomat staged that “illusion of choice” deliberately in 1967, which is why every Bandersnatch debate is, in a sense, a re-run of Montreal.

About the author

Sasha Poberailo (Oleksandr Poberailo) is a producer, filmmaker, and researcher of interactive cinema, a Doctor of Arts and lecturer at the Kharkiv State Academy of Culture (KhDAK). His master’s thesis covers the history of interactive cinema from Kinoautomat onward; his DVD-era study proposes this page’s branching typology. About · ORCID · ResearchGate

Sources


← All research